Corvinus
Corvinus

Efficacy and safety of infliximab-biosimilar compared to other biological drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed treatment comparison.

Baji, Petra, Péntek, Márta, Czirjak, László, Szekanecz, Zoltán, Nagy, György, Gulácsi, László and Brodszky, Valentin (2014) Efficacy and safety of infliximab-biosimilar compared to other biological drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed treatment comparison. European Journal of Health Economics . DOI 10.1007/s10198-014-0594-4

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
1MB

Official URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10198-014-0594-4


Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab-biosimilar and other available biologicals for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), namely abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab and tocilizumab. METHODS: A systematic literature review of MEDLINE database until August 2013 was carried out to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Bayesian mixed treatment comparison method was applied for the pairwise comparison of treatments. Improvement rates by the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20 and ACR50) at week 24 were used as efficacy endpoints, and the occurrence of serious adverse events was considered to assess the safety of the biologicals. RESULTS: Thirty-six RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. All the biological agents proved to be superior to placebo. For ACR20 response, certolizumab pegol showed the highest odds ratio (OR) compared to placebo, OR 7.69 [95 % CI 3.69-14.26], followed by abatacept OR 3.7 [95 % CI 2.17-6.06], tocilizumab OR 3.69 [95 % CI 1.87-6.62] and infliximab-biosimilar OR 3.47 [95 % CI 0.85-9.7]. For ACR50 response, certolizumab pegol showed the highest OR compared to placebo OR 8.46 [3.74-16.82], followed by tocilizumab OR 5.57 [95 % CI 2.77-10.09], and infliximab-biosimilar OR 4.06 [95 % CI 1.01-11.54]. Regarding the occurrence of serious adverse events, the results show no statistically significant difference between infliximab-biosimilar and placebo, OR 1.87 [95 % CI 0.74-3.84]. No significant difference regarding efficacy and safety was found between infliximab-biosimilar and the other biological treatments. CONCLUSION: This is the first indirect meta-analysis in RA that compares the efficacy and safety of biosimilar-infliximab to the other biologicals indicated in RA. We found no significant difference between infliximab-biosimilar and other biological agents in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.

Item Type:Article
Series Number / Identification Number:MTMT:2589952
Uncontrolled Keywords:Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Biosimilar pharmaceuticals, Meta-analysis, Mixed treatment comparison
JEL classification:I10 - Health: General
I19 - Health: Other
Divisions:Faculty of Economics > Department of Health Economics
Subjects:Social welfare, insurance, health care
Funders:Center for Public Affairs Studies Foundation, EGIS Pharmaceuticals
DOI:10.1007/s10198-014-0594-4
ID Code:1589
Deposited By: MTMT SWORD
Deposited On:02 Jun 2014 14:22
Last Modified:04 Jun 2014 07:55

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics