Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Philosophies among Hungarian Business Students

1. Moore, J.E.; Mascarenhas, A.; Bain, J.; Straus, S.E. Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability. Implement. Sci. 2017,
12, 1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https:
//sustainabledevelopment.un.org/ (accessed on 5 August 2021).
3. Salvia, A.L.; Filho, W.L.; Brandli, L.L.; Griebeler, J.S. Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: Local
and global issues. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 841–849. [CrossRef]
4. Szennay, Á.; Szigeti, C.; Kovács, N.; Szabó, D.R. Through the Blurry Looking Glass—SDGs in the GRI Reports. Resources 2019,
8, 101. [CrossRef]
5. Szegedi, K.; Fülöp, G.Y.; Bereczk, Á. Fogalmi meghatározások, modellek és példák a vállalati társadalmi felel˝osség és a tár-sadalmi
innováció hazai és nemzetközi irodalmából Észak-Magy. Strat. Füzetek 2015, 12, 122–128.
6. Braun, R. A vállalatok politikája: Vállalati társadalmi felel˝osségvállalás, vállalati közösségek és a vállalati stratégia jöv˝oje.
Vezetéstudomány 2013, 44, 18–28. [CrossRef]
7. Friedman, M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970; pp.
122–124.
8. Rappaport, A. Creating Shareholder Value: A Guide for Managers and Investors; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997.
9. Steurer, R.; Langer, M.E.; Konrad, A.; Martinuzzi, A. Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical
Exploration of Business–Society Relations. J. Bus. Ethics 2005, 61, 263–281. [CrossRef]
10. Bowen, H.R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman; Harper: New York, NY, USA, 1953.
11. International Organization for Standardization2010. Guidance on Social Responsibility (ISO Standard No. 26000). Available
online: https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html (accessed on 1 June 2021).
12. Graafland, J.; Mazereeuw-van der Duijn Schouten, C. Motives for Corporate Social Responsibility. De Econ. 2012, 160, 377–396.
[CrossRef]
13. Lewis, S. Reputation and corporate responsibility. J. Commun. Manag. 2003, 7, 356–366. [CrossRef]
14. H ˛abek, P. CSR Reporting Practices in Visegrad Group Countries and the Quality of Disclosure. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2322.
[CrossRef]
15. Bhatia, A.; Makkar, B. Extent and drivers of CSR disclosure: Evidence from Russia. Transnatl. Corp. Rev. 2019, 11, 190–207.
[CrossRef]
16. Tulcanaza-Prieto, A.; Shin, H.; Lee, Y.; Lee, C.W. Relationship among CSR Initiatives and Financial and Non-Financial Corporate
Performance in the Ecuadorian Banking Environment. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1621. [CrossRef]
17. Dahlsrud, A. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag.
2008, 15, 1–13. [CrossRef]
18. Fassin, Y.; Van Rossem, A.; Buelens, M. Small-Business Owner-Managers’ Perceptions of Business Ethics and CSR-Related
Concepts. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 98, 425–453. [CrossRef]
19. De Bakker, F.G.; Groenewegen, P.; den Hond, F. A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research on Corporate Social Responsibility
and Corporate Social Performance. Bus. Soc. 2005, 44, 283–317. [CrossRef]
20. Carroll, A.B. A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social
Responsibility; Crane, A., Matten, D., McWilliams, A., Moon, J., Siegel, D.S., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009.
21. Commission of the European Communities. Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility; COM (2001) 366;
European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
22. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament. The Council. The European Eco-nomic and
Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility; COM(2011)
681; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?
uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed on 1 June 2021).
23. McAleer, S. Friedman’s Stockholder Theory of Corporate Moral Responsibility. Teach. Bus. Ethics 2003, 7, 437–451. [CrossRef]
24. Joyner, B.E.; Payne, D. Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. J.
Bus. Ethics 2002, 41, 297–311. [CrossRef]
25. Carroll, A.B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus.
Horiz. 1991, 34, 39–48. [CrossRef]
26. Stevens, E. Business Ethics; Paulist Press: New York/Ramsey, NY, USA, 1979.
27. Miesing, P.; Preble, J.F. A comparison of five business philosophies. J. Bus. Ethics 1985, 4, 465–476. [CrossRef]
28. Neumann, Y.; Reichel, A. The Development of Attitudes Toward Business Ethics Questionnaire (ATBEQ): Concepts, Dimensions, and
Relations to Work Values; Working Paper; Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben Gurion University of the
Negev: Be’er Sheva, Israel, 1987.
29. Clark, D.; Tanner, T.; Pham, L.N.; Lau, W.K.; Nguyen, L.D. Attitudes toward business ethics: Empirical investigation on different
moral philosophies among business students in Vietnam. Int. J. Bus. Gov. Ethics 2020, 14, 123–142. [CrossRef]
30. Davis, M.A.; Andersen, M.G.; Curtis, M.B. Measuring Ethical Ideology in Business Ethics: A Critical Analysis of the Ethics
Position Questionnaire. J. Bus. Ethics 2001, 32, 35–53. [CrossRef]
31. Preble, J.F.; Reichel, A. Attitudes Towards Business Ethics of Future Managers in the US and Israel. J. Bus. Ethics 1988, 7, 941–949.
32. Kneževi´c, B.; Kurnoga, N.; Šimurina, N. Multivariate analysis of attitudes on financial and other aspects of business ethics of
future managers. Croat. Oper. Res. Rev. 2017, 8, 93–105. [CrossRef]
33. Small, M.W. Attitudes towards business ethics held by Western Australian students: A comparative study. J. Bus. Ethics 1992, 11,
745–752. [CrossRef]
34. Moore, R.S.; Radloff, S.E. Attitudes towards business ethics held by South African students. J. Bus. Ethics 1996, 15, 863–869.
[CrossRef]
35. Sims, R.L.; Gegez, A.E. Attitudes towards Business Ethics: A Five Nation Comparative Study. J. Bus. Ethics 2004, 50, 253–265.
[CrossRef]
36. Kum-Lung, C.; Teck-Chai, L. Attitude towards Business Ethics: Examining the Influence of Religiosity, Gender and Education
Levels. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2010, 2, 226–232. [CrossRef]
37. Bageac, D.; Furrer, O.; Reynaud, E. Management Students’ Attitudes Toward Business Ethics: A Comparison Between France and
Romania. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 98, 391–406. [CrossRef]
38. Price, G.; Van Der Walt, A.J. Changes in Attitudes Towards Business Ethics Held by Former South African Business Management
Students. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 113, 429–440. [CrossRef]
39. Shields, R.; Comegys, C.; Lupton, R.; Takei, H. Undergraduate Attitudes Toward Business Ethics: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.
J. Stud. Educ. 2013, 3, 72. [CrossRef]
40. Gulova, A.; Eryilmaz, I.; Ispirli, D. Attitudes towards business ethics: An empirical study on Turkish senior business students.
Int. Proc. Econ. Dev. Res. 2013, 65, 42–47. [CrossRef]
41. Phatshwane, P.M.D.; Mapharing, M.; Basuhi, E.J. Attitudes towards Business Ethics Held by Accountancy and Finance Students
in the University of Botswana. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2014, 9, 17–29. [CrossRef]
42. Carroll, A.B.; Shabana, K.M. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice.
Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2010, 12, 85–105. [CrossRef]
43. Jenkins, H. A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective. J. Gen. Manag. 2004, 29, 37–57. [CrossRef]
44. Santos, M.J. CSR in SMEs: Strategies, practices, motivations and obstacles. Soc. Responsib. J. 2011, 7, 490–508. [CrossRef]
45. Kechiche, A.; Soparnot, R. CSR within SMEs: Literature Review. Int. Bus. Res. 2012, 5, 97–104. [CrossRef]
46. Pham, L.N.; Nguyen, L.D.; Favia, M.J. Business students’ attitudes toward business ethics: An empirical investigation in Vietnam.
J. Asia Bus. Stud. 2015, 9, 289–305. [CrossRef]
47. Sims, R.L. Comparing ethical attitudes across cultures. Cross Cult. Manag. Int. J. 2006, 13, 101–113. [CrossRef]
48. Pallant, J. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS, 7th ed.; Open University Press: London,
UK, 2020.
49. Sajtos, L.; Mitev, A. SPSS Kutatási és Adatelemzési Kézikönyv; Alinea: Budapest, Hungary, 2007.
50. Pálvölgyi, T.; Nagypál, N.C.; Szlávik, J.; Csáfor, H.; Csete, M. Striking Oil? CSR and the EU Integration Processes: The Example of
Hungary. In Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe. Rhetoric and Realities; Barth, R., Wolff, E., Eds.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham,
UK; Northampton, UK, 2009; pp. 269–288.
51. Christie, R.; Geis, F. Studies in Machiavellianism; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1970.
52. Czibor, A.; Vincze, O.; Bereczkei, T. Feelings and motives underlying Machiavellian behavioural strategies; narrative reports in a
social dilemma situation. Int. J. Psychol. 2014, 49, 519–524. [CrossRef]
53. Maccormick, N. The Ethics of Legalism. Ratio Juris 1989, 2, 184–193. [CrossRef]