Corvinus
Corvinus

The Effect of Distancing Policies on the Reproduction Number of COVID-19

Rácz, Olivér Miklós (2023) The Effect of Distancing Policies on the Reproduction Number of COVID-19. Working Paper. Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
1MB

Abstract

Distancing policies became the primary preventive intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper estimates the effect of such interventions on the effective reproduction number (Rt) of this virus on a daily panel of 109 countries. Distancing interventions affect COVID infections indirectly through the regulation of social behaviors, which are also a function of voluntary decisions. The main contribution of this paper is the separation of policy-compliant and voluntary distancing effects. I identify the policy-compliant component of distancing behavior as rapid changes in social activity immediately after an intervention. This allows me to isolate the voluntary component as residual changes in activity. I use the isolated voluntary component as a control in the main estimation of distancing policy effects on Rt. I distinguish between (i) place restrictions: restricting destinations and (ii) mobility restrictions: regulations on inland movements. I find strong and permanent effects for both types of restrictions. Place restrictions that target specific destinations are found to be less effective than general mobility restrictions. The effect of voluntary distancing is also significantly negative but weaker than that of policy restrictions. These results suggest that governments can use distancing restrictions effectively in pushing the effective reproduction number below the containment threshold: Rt = 1.

Item Type:Monograph (Working Paper)
Series Name:Corvinus Economics Working Papers - CEWP
Series Number / Identification Number:2023/01
Uncontrolled Keywords:COVID-19, non-pharmaceutical interventions, causal identification, reproduction number, regression-discontinuity-in-time
JEL classification:C33 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models: Panel Data Models; Spatio-temporal Models
C43 - Index Numbers and Aggregation; Leading indicators
C54 - Quantitative Policy Modeling
E65 - Studies of Particular Policy Episodes
H12 - Crisis Management
H39 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents: Other
H84 - Disaster Aid
I12 - Health Production
I18 - Health: Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
Divisions:Institute of Economics
Subjects:Mathematics, Econometrics
Social welfare, insurance, health care
References:

Askitas, N., Tatsiramos, K., and Verheyden, B. (2021). Estimating worldwide effects of nonpharmaceutical
interventions on covid-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multipleevent study. Scientific reports, 11(1):1–13.

Castex, G., Dechter, E., and Lorca, M. (2021). Covid-19: The impact of social distancing policies, cross-country analysis. Economics of disasters and climate change, 5(1):135–159.

Chernozhukov, V., Kasahara, H., and Schrimpf, P. (2021). Causal impact of masks, policies, behavior on early covid-19 pandemic in the us. Journal of Econometrics, 220(1):23–62.

Cori, A., Ferguson, N. M., Fraser, C., and Cauchemez, S. (2013). A new framework and software to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers during epidemics. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178(9):1505–1512.

Cox, N. J. (2009). CSIPOLATE: Stata module to perform cubic spline interpolation. Statistical Software
Components, Boston College Department of Economics.
Cunningham, S. (2021). Causal Inference. Yale University Press.

Gupta, S., Nguyen, T. D., Rojas, F. L., Raman, S., Lee, B., Bento, A., Simon, K. I., and Wing, C. (2020a). Tracking public and private response to the covid-19 epidemic: Evidence from state and local government actions. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Gupta, S., Simon, K. I., and Wing, C. (2020b). Mandated and voluntary social distancing during the covid-19 epidemic: A review.

Hale, T., Webster, S., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., and Kira, B. (2020). Oxford covid-19 government response tracker.

Haug, N., Geyrhofer, L., Londei, A., Dervic, E., Desvars-Larrive, A., Loreto, V., Pinior, B., Thurner,
S., and Klimek, P. (2020). Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide covid-19 government interventions.
Nature human behaviour, 4(12):1303–1312.

Hausman, C. and Rapson, D. S. (2018). Regression discontinuity in time: Considerations for empirical
applications. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10:533–552.

Heckman, J. J. and Sedlacek, G. (1985). Heterogeneity, aggregation, and market wage functions: an
empirical model of self-selection in the labor market. Journal of political Economy, 93(6):1077–1125.

Islam, N., Sharp, S. J., Chowell, G., Shabnam, S., Kawachi, I., Lacey, B., Massaro, J. M., D’Agostino,
R. B., and White, M. (2020). Physical distancing interventions and incidence of coronavirus disease
2019: natural experiment in 149 countries. British Medical Journal, 370.

Koh, W. C., Naing, L., and Wong, J. (2020). Estimating the impact of physical distancing measures in
containing covid-19: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 100:42–49.

Liu, Y., Gayle, A. A., Wilder-Smith, A., and Rocklöv, J. (2020). The reproductive number of covid-19 is
higher compared to sars coronavirus. Journal of travel medicine.

Perra, N. (2021). Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the covid-19 pandemic: A review. Physics Reports.

Petersen, E., Koopmans, M., Go, U., Hamer, D. H., Petrosillo, N., Castelli, F., Storgaard, M., Al Khalili,
S., and Simonsen, L. (2020). Comparing sars-cov-2 with sars-cov and influenza pandemics. The Lancet
infectious diseases.

Picard, R. (2015). GEOINPOLY: Stata module to match geographic locations to shapefile polygons.
Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics.

Seres, G., Balleyer, A. H., Cerutti, N., Danilov, A., Friedrichsen, J., Liu, Y., and Süer, M. (2021). Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of the Economic Science Association, pages 1–20.

Silva, J. S. and Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and statistics, 88(4):641–658.

Ullah, A. and Ajala, O. A. (2020). Do lockdown and testing help in curbing covid-19 transmission? Covid Economics, 13:138–185.

Wahltinez, O. et al. (2020). Covid-19 open-data: curating a fine-grained, global-scale data repository for sars-cov-2. Work in progress.

ID Code:7948
Deposited By: Ádám Hoffmann
Deposited On:20 Feb 2023 12:19
Last Modified:04 Apr 2023 07:21

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics