Asemi, Asefeh 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1667-4408 and Rasti, Pooya ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2486-6545
(2023)
Mendeley Readership and Scopus Citation : A Comparison Study in Nursing.
International Journal of Information Science and Management, 21
(4).
pp. 259-274.
DOI 10.22034/ijism.2023.1977698.0
![[img]](https://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
299kB |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2023.1977698.0
Abstract
The quantitative research study used scientometrics methods to compare the readership of nursing journal articles shared on Mendeley and the frequency of citations of these articles in Scopus. The sample size included all articles published in 110 nursing journals over two years, and the data was collected using Mendeley Altmetrics, Scopus citation analysis, and SCImago Journal Rank list. The frequency of readership on Mendeley and the frequency of citations in Scopus were analyzed using Spearman's test and SPSS software. The results showed a positive and significant correlation between the frequency of readership in Mendeley and the frequency of citations in Scopus, with a moderate relationship between them. The Spearman's test result was 0.649 for the first year and 0.539 for the second year, at a significance level of 0.001. The study concluded that Mendeley and Scopus can be used to evaluate the quality of articles and ranking journals. However, qualitative evaluation is also needed to determine the appropriate measurement tools and their prioritization. The study suggests that the results can be used by researchers, editors, and publishers to evaluate the impact of their work and to make informed decisions about future publishing strategies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Scientometrics, Citation, Readership, Scopus Journal Report (SJR), Altmetrics, Mendeley, Scopus, Scientific Articles, Nursing Journals |
| Divisions: | Corvinus Doctoral Schools Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for Business Law Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for Environmental Science Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for Environmental Science > Business Ethics Center Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for Environmental Science > Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for Environmental Science > Department of Economic Geography Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for Environmental Science > Department of Environmental Economics and Technology Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for Environmental Science > Futures Studies Department Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for Environmental Science > Economic Geography and Futures Studies Department Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for Environmental Science > Regional Centre for Energy Policy Research Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for the Development of Enterprises Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for the Development of Enterprises > Department of Strategy and Project Management Faculty of Business Administration > Institute for the Development of Enterprises > Department of Enterprise Finances Faculty of Business Administration > Institute of Business Economics Faculty of Business Administration > Institute of Business Economics > Competitiveness Research Center Faculty of Business Administration > Institute of Business Economics > Department of Business Studies |
| Subjects: | Information economy Knowledge economy, innovation Social welfare, insurance, health care |
| DOI: | 10.22034/ijism.2023.1977698.0 |
| ID Code: | 10499 |
| Deposited By: | MTMT SWORD |
| Deposited On: | 06 Nov 2024 12:09 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Nov 2024 12:09 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page
Download Statistics
Download Statistics