Corvinus
Corvinus

Why researchers should be cautious about using PLS-SEM

Henseler, Jörg ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9736-3048, Schuberth, Florian, Lee, Nick and Kemény, Ildikó ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6738-8252 (2025) Why researchers should be cautious about using PLS-SEM. Industrial Marketing Management, 128 . A8-A15. DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.01.017

[img] PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
626kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.01.017


Abstract

A recent contribution to Industrial Marketing Management by Guenther, Guenther, Ringle, Zaefarian, and Cartwright (2023) aims at “[i]mproving PLS-SEM use.” It assumes that the use of PLS-SEM could be improved by more strictly following existing PLS-SEM guidelines and using advanced techniques. Unfortunately, such “improved” use of PLS-SEM does not necessarily translate into more rigorous scientific analyses. In this commentary, we show that the PLS-SEM guidelines themselves are problematic and that using PLS-SEM can lead to erroneous conclusions. It is, therefore, not so much the use of PLS-SEM that needs improvement, but the literature on PLS-SEM itself, particularly its guidelines. The commentary concludes with recommendations for analysts and questions for PLS-SEM proponents to stimulate further research on PLS-SEM.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:PLS-SEM; Consistent; PLS; Reflective measurement; Scenario analysis; Bias
Divisions:Institute of Marketing and Communication Sciences
Subjects:Marketing
DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.01.017
ID Code:11626
Deposited By: MTMT SWORD
Deposited On:29 Jul 2025 07:35
Last Modified:29 Jul 2025 07:35

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics