Corvinus
Corvinus

Measuring health-related quality of life in infants and toddlers : conceptual challenges and proposed recommendations

Powell, Philip A., Rencz, Fanni ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-620X, Carlton, Jill, Schieskow, Simone, Peasgood, Tessa, Mulhern, Brendan, Finch, Aureliano Paolo ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1438-321X, Herdman, Mike and Verstraete, Janine (2026) Measuring health-related quality of life in infants and toddlers : conceptual challenges and proposed recommendations. Quality of Life Research, 35 (5). DOI 10.1007/s11136-026-04199-8

[img] PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
852kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04199-8


Abstract

Purpose Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the very young (i.e., infants and toddlers, aged 0–47 months) presents unique conceptual and methodological challenges. As infants and toddlers cannot reliably self-report their HRQoL, observer inference is necessary. This raises questions about which concepts should be included; how to manage proxy reporting; and how to capture genuine variations in HRQoL, not changes in development or assessment. This commentary outlines six key challenges in measuring infant and toddler HRQoL and details eight proposed recommendations for HRQoL researchers. Methods The piece draws on insights from the EuroQol Toddler and Infant Populations (EQ-TIPS) project, aimed to develop a generic preference-weighted measure (PWM) of HRQoL for infants and children, but has broader applicability to HRQoL measurement in the very young. Key issues addressed include: (i) what concepts to measure; (ii) how to identify which concepts matter to very young children; (iii) managing proxy reporting and reducing bias; (iv) accounting for rapid developmental changes; (v) managing continuity across life-course instruments; and (vi) separating child HRQoL from family spillover effects. Results Proposed recommendations include greater consensus on a core HRQoL model; prioritising primary caregiver perspectives; justifying and operationalising observable aspects of subjective HRQoL; careful design to capture genuine HRQoL, not developmental change or caregiver spillover; and developing measurement systems to prioritise age-based sensitivity or comparability across time. Conclusion These recommendations offer a foundation for future consensus-building and research to refine and harmonise best practices in infant and toddler HRQoL measurement, particularly for use in health technology assessment.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:Early childhood; Health-related quality of life; Health technology assessment; Observer-reported outcomes; Preference-weighted measures; Proxy reporting
Divisions:Institute of Social and Political Sciences
Subjects:Social welfare, insurance, health care
DOI:10.1007/s11136-026-04199-8
ID Code:12677
Deposited By: MTMT SWORD
Deposited On:02 Apr 2026 09:34
Last Modified:02 Apr 2026 09:34

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics