Corvinus
Corvinus

The Banking Sector's Own AI Footprint: The energy and carbon impacts of artificial intelligence applications in banking operations

Bagó, Péter ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6929-8437 (2026) The Banking Sector's Own AI Footprint: The energy and carbon impacts of artificial intelligence applications in banking operations. Economy and Finance, 13 (3). pp. 301-336. DOI https://doi.org/10.33908/EF.2026.3.2

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
523kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.33908/EF.2026.3.2

13456-os tétel angol nyelvű utánközlése.

Abstract

Over the past decade, the banking sector has become a key actor in the sustainability transition through the measurement of financed emissions (Scope 3) and the decarbonisation of portfolios. At the same time, however, artificial intelligence (AI) solutions have been proliferating rapidly in the operations of credit institutions – from customer-service chatbots and credit-risk models to agentic systems that automate multiple steps of business workflows. The energy and resource requirements of these applications constitute a dynamically growing component of the sector’s own environmental footprint that has so far received little attention. This study has three objectives. First, it reviews the international literature and measurement methodologies concerning the lifecycle environmental impacts of AI systems, including training, inference, embodied emissions, and water and resource consumption. Second, it examines how current trends in the adoption of AI in banking – particularly the growing use of generative and agentic AI – affect credit institutions’ Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions categories and, through an exploratory document analysis of the 2025 disclosures of nine credit institutions, provides empirical evidence that AI-related energy consumption cannot currently be identified in prevailing reporting practices. Third, it proposes a methodological framework for quantifying the “banking AI footprint” and integrating it into sustainability reporting (CSRD/ESRS). The study argues that, alongside the narrative of “greening by AI”, the sector must also institutionalise a “greening of AI” perspective: without energy-related criteria being incorporated into AI procurement decisions, model sizing, and cloud-service agreements, digital transformation may undermine the credibility of banks’ own climate targets.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:artificial intelligence, banking sector, carbon footprint, data centres, ESG, sustainability reporting, CSRD, EU AI Act
JEL classification:G21 - Banks; Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
M14 - Business Administration: Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
Q54 - Climate; Natural Disasters; Global Warming
Q56 - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
Divisions:Institute of Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Subjects:Automatizálás, gépesítés
Environmental economics
Finance
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33908/EF.2026.3.2
ID Code:13457
Deposited By: MTMT SWORD
Deposited On:10 Nov 2026 12:54
Last Modified:10 Nov 2026 13:02

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics