Deák, Dániel (2014) Legislating unorthodox taxes: The Hungarian experience. Society and Economy, 36 (3). pp. 339-368. DOI 10.1556/SocEc.36.2014.3.2
|
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
575kB |
Official URL: http://www.akademiai.com/content/4866024608476v87/
This paper is a further developed version of the paper prepared on the same subject and to be published by Lodz University
Abstract
To date, a series of non-traditional schemes have proliferated in the area of tax law, challenging the widely accepted principles of tax legislation. Lump-sum or presumptive taxes, redemption fees or tax amnesty, corrective taxes (bank levies), or confiscatory taxes (e.g., banker bonuses) can hardly be reconciled with the hard core of tax legislation that is established on the principles of equality and legal certainty. The present paper discusses these unorthodox types of public charges.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | tax amnesty, arbitrary state, windfall gain, redemption fee, Rubik agreements, fiscal populism, balanced-budget provision, non-discrimination, proportionality, confiscatory tax, share of social burdens, reverse discrimination, protection of human dignity in tax matters, distributive justice, proper operation of law |
JEL classification: | K34 - Tax Law |
Divisions: | Faculty of Business Administration > Institute of Finance and Accounting > Department of Business Law |
Subjects: | Law Finance |
DOI: | 10.1556/SocEc.36.2014.3.2 |
ID Code: | 1748 |
Deposited By: | Ádám Hoffmann |
Deposited On: | 21 Nov 2014 08:56 |
Last Modified: | 13 Dec 2021 09:18 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page