Friesz, Melinda and Váradi, Kata (2021) How is it Done? Comparison between the Margin Calculation methodology of central counterparties and clearinghouses. Public Finance Quarterly = Pénzügyi Szemle, 66 (3). pp. 397-412. DOI https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2021_3_5
|
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
885kB |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2021_3_5
Abstract
Clearinghouses and central counterparties have become the backbone of financial markets by stepping between trades, facilitating securities trading, and derivative transactions on exchanges and overthe-counter markets. In the literature and in practice, too, the notion of clearinghouse and central counterparty are used as synonyms, but there is still a slight difference that highlights their distinction. This paper focuses on the margin calculation methodology of these institutions and emphasizes the contrast between the two. Results show that although capturing the same risks, clearinghouses’ margin requirement is better from a procyclicality and cash flow management point of view; however, central counterparties margining is more prudent based on our results.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | initial margin, maintenance margin, variation margin, central counterparty, clearinghouse |
JEL classification: | G15 - International Financial Markets G17 - Financial Forecasting and Simulation G18 - General Financial Markets: Government Policy and Regulation |
Subjects: | Finance |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2021_3_5 |
ID Code: | 8613 |
Deposited By: | Alexa Horváth |
Deposited On: | 11 Sep 2023 09:35 |
Last Modified: | 11 Sep 2023 09:35 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page