Dudás, Gábor János, Kovács, András György ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-7982 and Schultz, Márton (2023) Personal Data as Consideration. Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 9 (2). pp. 215-242. DOI https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.23.029.18649
|
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
363kB |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.23.029.18649
Abstract
This article argues that from the perspective of data protection, privacy, and personality law it can be justified that personal data may have a commercial value in the European legal systems, and as such it can function as a consideration and has a quid pro quo character. In the authors’ opinion the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) should not exclude, in principle – as it has done so far – that data concerning the data subject can be used as contractual consideration, especially in the world of the Internet. In particular, it cannot be excluded solely on the basis that the right to privacy is not transferable, a position taken thus far in the EDPB’s practice. This proposed new approach is supported by the fact that in some EU Member States the property aspects of the general right of personality have been recognized, a stance which may also apply to personal data, without the need to recognize a kind of data ownership or sui generis intellectual property right in the data. Thus, the theory of commercial aspects of personality rights can be linked to the commercial value of personal data. Such an approach has not been elaborated before, despite the proximity of these fields of law. The quid pro quo function of personal data may also be recognized in line with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In fact, maintaining the interpretation of the EDPB – which denies the quid pro quo character of personal data from a fundamental rights perspective – means that the dangers of such data processing cannot be assessed. This affects cultural heritage in many aspects – from the sending of newsletters to selling merchandise products in museums. The EDPB’s guidelines, as soft law, have no direct impact on the case-law of the national courts, thus this interpretation – which ignores actual data management practices – also significantly increases the risk of a collision between the simultaneously available – i.e. both in terms of administrative and judicial practice – remedy regimes created by the GDPR.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Divisions: | Institute of Accounting and Law |
Subjects: | Law |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.23.029.18649 |
ID Code: | 9570 |
Deposited By: | MTMT SWORD |
Deposited On: | 19 Dec 2023 10:47 |
Last Modified: | 19 Dec 2023 10:47 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page