Corvinus
Corvinus

Heterogeneous collective criticality in cryptocurrency volatility : scaling collapse, tail synchronization, and cascade amplification

Zouari, Michael ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2228-713X, Alon, Ilan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-593X and Shtudiner, Zeev ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-3565 (2026) Heterogeneous collective criticality in cryptocurrency volatility : scaling collapse, tail synchronization, and cascade amplification. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 211 (Pt 1). DOI 10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118809

[img] PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
1MB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118809


Abstract

This paper tests whether the volatility of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL) is better characterized as a heterogeneous collective-critical regime than as asset-by-asset turbulence. Using daily and hourly data, with the daily S&P 500 cash index and the near-continuously-traded EUR/USD reference rate as contrast benchmarks, we extend the Bergmann–Oliveira critical-boundary framework from single-series classification to coupled volatility dynamics. Four results support the claim. First, Ethereum is robustly supercritical and Solana is supercritical under finite-sample validation, whereas Bitcoin is boundary-adjacent, with a point estimate below the boundary but a circular-block interval crossing CR = 1. Second, boundary distance and tail-clustering depth are distinct system-level coordinates: Solana has the largest boundary distance, while Bitcoin exhibits the slowest tail-dependence decay. Third, crypto clustering functions exhibit scaling collapse near a common exponent, β ≈ 0.31, and pairwise and triadic co-exceedances remain above circular-shift, block-shuffle, and factor-residual null envelopes. Fourth, short-horizon volatility-of-volatility preserves cascade amplification, while long smoothing absorbs it; intraday boundary estimates are scale- and estimator-sensitive rather than fixed activation constants. The boundary configuration is not a conditional-heteroskedasticity artifact: heavy tails persist after GARCH/EGARCH/FIGARCH filtering, FIGARCH confirms genuine fractional integration, and a Gaussian-innovation GARCH cannot reproduce the observed supercriticality. The regime is further corroborated by marginal-matched surrogates that isolate the collective component. Conceptually, it recasts a single-series phase boundary as a diagnostic of synchronized collective instability. Practically, crypto tail risk should be monitored through boundary proximity, tail synchronization, and cascade propagation rather than marginal volatility alone. © 2026 The Authors.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:Self-organized criticality; Long memory; Tail dependence; Cryptocurrency volatility; Critical boundary; Extreme event clustering; Scaling collapse;
Divisions:Institute of Strategy and Management
Subjects:Mathematics, Econometrics
Finance
DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118809
ID Code:13100
Deposited By: MTMT SWORD
Deposited On:22 Jul 2026 08:12
Last Modified:22 Jul 2026 08:12

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics