Juhász, Tímea ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-0678, Kálmán, Botond Géza ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8031-8016 and Tóth, Arnold ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0860-6405 (2022) Offences and punishments in the workplace. Economics and Sociology, 15 (3). pp. 59-73. DOI 10.14254/2071-789X.2022/15-3/3
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
784kB |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2022/15-3/3
Abstract
It is no longer a question today that in many cases employees find themselves in a situation where either they or their environment believe that they have committed a misdemeanor or sin at work. The perception of sin can depend on a number of factors, such as the particular organizational culture, management, employee preferences, the degree of trust in the organization, and so on. There are cases where we judge the same sin differently, making the severity and extent of the penalties involved vary. The present study examines workplace offenses and subsequent employer penalties and their impact. The researchers did not focus on illegal acts, but on those that violate moral standards or affect an employee's professional development and ability to advance in the workplace. The analysis made a distinction between misdemeanors that came to light and those that did not. The test results confirmed the following. The employees are more critical of their own faults than the employer, and this is especially true of moral faults. People experience sin and punishment differently by gender and age. Keywords: sin, punishment, offence, workplace
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | sin, punishment, offence, workplace |
JEL classification: | J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor |
Subjects: | Human resource management Labour economics |
DOI: | 10.14254/2071-789X.2022/15-3/3 |
ID Code: | 9792 |
Deposited By: | MTMT SWORD |
Deposited On: | 29 Apr 2024 09:34 |
Last Modified: | 29 Apr 2024 10:01 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page