Tasnádi, Attila and Puppe, Clemens (2025) Violin Virtuosi: Do their Performances Fade over Time? Working Paper. Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest.
|
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
452kB |
Abstract
In many professional activities humans are getting better generation by generation. This is supposed to be the case, for instance, in sports and in science. Is it true in the arts? In this paper, we consider violinists from the time period in which audio and video recordings became possible. Based on the number of YouTube views, and by employing different aggregation methods, we find that listening to violinists from the mid of the previous century does not seem to be significantly less attractive to audiences than listening to contemporary violinists. Methodologically, our analysis contributes to the growing literature on the aggregation of incomplete lists. In particular, we introduce a generalization of the Nash collective utility function for incomplete lists.
| Item Type: | Monograph (Working Paper) |
|---|---|
| Series Name: | Corvinus Economics Working Papers - CEWP |
| Series Number / Identification Number: | 2025/01 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | group decisions and negotiations, multi-criteria decision making, aggregation of incomplete lists, Nash collective utility function, top violinists |
| JEL classification: | D71 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making: Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations |
| Divisions: | Institute of Data Analytics and Information Systems |
| Subjects: | Decision making Mathematics, Econometrics |
| References: | d'Aspremont, C. & Gevers, L. (1977). Equity and the informational basis of collective choice. The Review of Economic Studies, 44, 199-209. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297061
d'Aspremont, C. & Gevers, L. (2002). Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability.
Ausloos, M. (2024). Hierarchy selection: New team ranking indicators for cyclist multistage races. European Journal of Operational Research, 314, 807-816.
Blackorby, C., Bossert, W. & Donaldson, D. (2002), Utilitarianism and the theory of justice. K. Arrow, A.K. Sen & K. Suzumura (Eds.), Handbook of social choice and welfare,
Borodin, A., Roberts, G.O., Rosenthal, J.S., & Tsaparas, P. (2005). Link analysis ranking: Algorithms, theory, and experiments. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 5, 231-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1052934.1052942
Bortolussi, L., Dinu, L.P., & Sgarro, A. (2012). Spearman permutation distances and Shannon's distinguishability. Fundamenta Informaticae, 118, 245-252. http://dx.doi.
Bozóki, S., Csató, L. & Temesi, J. (2016). An application of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices for ranking top tennis players. European Journal of Operational Research, 248, 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.069
Campbell, M. (2011). The great violinists. Farber & Farber.
Chen, R. (2023). Ranking the best violin concertos. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/
Classic fm (2022). The 25 greatest violinists of all time. Retrieved from https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/instruments/violin/best-violinists-ever.
Csató, L. (2023). A comparative study of scoring systems by simulations. Journal of Sports Economics, 24, 526-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15270025221134241
Debreu, G. (1959). Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In: K Arrow, S. Karlin & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical Methods in Social Sciences (pp. 16-26). Stanford University Press.
Dhillon, A. & Mertens, J-F. (1999). Relative utilitarianism. Econometrica, 67, 471-498.
Dopazo, E. & Martnez-Cespedes, M.L. (2015). Rank aggregation methods dealing with incomplete information applied to Smart Cities. Presentation at the IEEE International Conference
Dwork, C., Kumar, R., Naor, M. & Sivakumar, D. (2002). Rank aggregation revisited. Retrieved from http://www.cse.msu.edu/~cse960/Papers/games/rank.pdf. Accessed:
Kontek, K. & Kenner, K. (2023). Identifying outlier scores and outlier jurors to reduce manipulation in classical music competitions. Journal of Cultural Economics, in press.
Hochbaum, D. & Moreno-Centeno, E. (2021). Joint aggregation of cardinal and ordinal evaluations with an application to a student paper competition. Retrieved from https:
Masthoff, J. (2004). Group modeling: Selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. In Ardissono, L., Kobsa, A., & and Maybury, M. (eds.), Personalized
Moreno-Centeno, E. & Escobedo, A.R. (2016). Axiomatic aggregation of incomplete rankings. IIE Transactions, 48, 475-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1109737
Moulin, H. (1988). Axioms of cooperative decision making. Cambridge University Press.
Nicolas, J. (2024). Best violinists: Top 20 greatest all time. Retrieved from https://www.udiscovermusic.com/classical-features/best-violinists/. Accessed: April 13, 2024.
Peitler, P. & Schlag, K.H. (2024). Putting context into preference aggregation. Retrieved
Pini, M.S., Rossi, F., Venable, K.B. & Walsh, T. (2009). Aggregating partially ordered
Puppe, C. & Tasnádi, A. (2024). Aggregating incomplete lists. Unpublished results.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.
Ranker.com (2024). The greatest violinists of all time. Retrieved from: https://www.ranker.com/list/greatest-violinists-of-all-time/ranker-music?ref=collections_top&l=1463093&collectionId=1433. Accessed: April 14, 2024
Sarlo, D. (2010) Investigating performer uniqueness: The case of Jascha Heifetz, Ph.D. Thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London. https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/
Sprumont, Y. (2019). Relative utilitarianism under uncertainty. Social Choice and Welfare,
Temesi, J., Szádoczki, Z. & Bozóki, S. (2024). Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices: Ranking top women tennis players. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 75, 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2023.2180447
Volkovs, M.N. & Zemel, R.S. (2014). New learning methods for supervised and unsupervised preference aggregation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 981-1022.
Walpole, R.R., Myers, R.H., Myers, S.L. & Ye, K. (2016). Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists (9th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. |
| ID Code: | 11589 |
| Deposited By: | A H |
| Deposited On: | 22 Jul 2025 13:52 |
| Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2025 13:52 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page


Download Statistics
Download Statistics